Forum
U.S. Supreme Court
Case Status
Docket Number
Term
2024 Term
Lower Court Opinion
Questions Presented
1. Whether a party may establish the redressability component of Article III standing by relying on the coercive and predictable effects of regulation on third parties.
2. Whether EPA’s preemption waiver for California’s greenhouse-gas emission standards and zero emission-vehicle mandate is unlawful.
Case Updates
Supreme Court holds that fuel producers have Article III standing to challenge EPA decision approving California regulations that directly apply to automakers and aim to decrease emissions from the use of gasoline and other liquid fuels
June 20, 2025
U.S. Chamber files coalition amicus brief urging Supreme Court to reaffirm that businesses have Article III standing to challenge agency actions that predictably harm them, including agency actions that do not directly regulate such businesses
February 03, 2025
U.S. Chamber Coalition Amicus Brief
Jaime A. Santos, William M. Jay, and Benjamin Hayes of Goodwin Procter LLP served as outside counsel.
Cert. petition granted
December 13, 2024
U.S. Chamber files coalition amicus brief urging Supreme Court to grant certiorari to decide whether a party may establish the redressability component of Article III standing by relying on the predictable effects of regulation on third parties
August 07, 2024
U.S. Chamber Coalition Amicus Brief
Jaime A. Santos, William M. Jay, and Benjamin Hayes of Goodwin Procter LLP served as outside counsel.
Case Documents
- D.C. Circuit Opinion -- Ohio v. EPA (U.S. Supreme Court)
- U.S. Chamber Coalition Amicus Brief (cert.) -- Diamond Alternative Energy, LLC v. EPA (U.S. Supreme Court)
- U.S. Chamber Coalition Amicus Brief (merits) -- Diamond Alternative Energy, LLC v. EPA (U.S. Supreme Court)
- Opinion -- Diamond Alternative Energy, LLC v. EPA (U.S. Supreme Court)