Antitrust
The Chamber advocates for antitrust laws that benefit all consumers and businesses and do not target specific companies or industries.

Latest
Our Work
Antitrust laws ensure competition in free and open markets, which is the foundation of any vibrant, diverse, and dynamic economy. Healthy market competition benefits consumers through lower prices, higher quality products and services, more choices, and greater innovation.
Events
- Employment PolicyApproaches to Combating Human TraffickingMonday, July 2108:30 AM EDT - 02:30 PM EDT1615 H Street, NW, Washington, DC 20062Learn More
- The Business of DiversityLessons in Leadership: Featuring Women of WashingtonTuesday, July 2904:30 PM EDT - 06:30 PM EDT1615 H Street, NW, Washington, DC 20062Learn More
- EconomyFree Enterprise Exchange: Why Is Industrial Policy So Prone to Fail?Thursday, July 3112:00 PM EDT - 12:45 PM EDTVirtualLearn More
Latest Content
- The FTC's lawsuit against Meta threatens decades of merger stability and economic growth.
- The DOJ's proposed remedies may be overly broad, risking harm to competition and innovation. A targeted approach is needed to address specific antitrust violations.
- The Chamber submitted comments to the FTC and DOJ, recommending strategies to reduce regulatory barriers and enhance free market competition.
- The Chamber's response letter to the Office of Management and Budget’s “Request for Information: Deregulation" comment.
- Answering antitrust’s challenges one question at a time.
- The FTC's rulemaking often resulted in regulations that compromised the agency's credibility and overlooked statutory requirements.
- The Neo-Brandeisian movement's attempt to reshape and influence merger law and policy ultimately fell short, failing to gain traction in the courts.
- Biden's executive order on competition micro-managed the economy to advance political objectives that undermined economic growth.
- This white paper examines how the progressive Neo-Brandeisian movement has failed to change antitrust law.